In bold letters, it proclaims:
TEXAS IS Now America's Magnet for ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
While conservatives in other states have passed tough laws to stop illegal immigration by requiring companies to verify the immigration status of their workers, construction company owner Paul Workman has been fighting reform here in Texas. Texas is now the "go-to" state in the country for illegal immigrants looking for a job. Paul Workman wants to keep it that way.
Illegal immigration costs Texas taxpayers $4.7 billion per year.
Paul Workman is making the problem even worse . . .
Illegal immigration is bankrupting Texas. An estimated one million people are here illegally with more on the way. Paul Workman has joined the liberals and is fighting reform. He has funded the campaigns of politicians and PACs that oppose making it harder for illegal immigrants to find jobs in Texas. Workman even funded liberal pro-abortion Democrats in races to defeat Republicans to "benefit [his] business" he said. Workman has made millions off government construction contracts. And he has openly admitted that he does not verify the immigration status of his own construction company workers. It's time for taxpayers to take a stand against people like Paul Workman who have been taking advantage of us.
The mailer makes four claims about Paul Workman.
1. Paul Workman wants to keep Texas as the "go-to" state for illegal immigrants looking for a job.
2. Paul Workman is fighting reform.
3. Paul Workman does not verify the immigration status of his own workers.
4. Paul Workman has been "taking advantage of us."
Ronald Reagan used to say that the Eleventh Commandment was "Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of a Fellow Republican." However, another commandment which comes to mind is the Eighth Commandment which says "You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor."
According to Luther's Small Catechism, this means:
We should fear and love God so that we do not tell lies about our neighbour, betray him, slander him, or hurt his reputation, but defend him, speak well of him,and explain everything in the kindest way.
So how do Ms. Turner's statements hold up to this standard? Her mailer cites the following sources for her statements:
1. Southwest Republican Club, February 3, 2010.
2. American Federation on Immigration Reform, April 2005.
3. Texas Ethics Commission records reveal Workman campaign contributions to Democrats Kirk Watson, Dawna Dukes, Johyn Sharp, Patrick Rose.
4. February 26, 2010 Candidate Forum at Veritas Academy.
The "sourcing" gives the attacks an air of authenticity. However, what do they really show? The sourcing doesn't really say much. However, going behind the sources shows two facts:
1. According to the Texas Ethics Commission, Paul Workman made 70 political contributions in the past ten years, ranging from $5.00 to $1,000.00. Of these 70 contributions, seven were made to Democrats, including:
a. John Sharp $200.00
b. Mina Brees $100.00
c. Dawna Dukes $100.00
d. Kirk Watson $600.00 (three contributions)
e. Patrick Rose $250.00
He also made contributions to Rick Perry, Susan Combs, Jerry Patterson, Terry Keel, Todd Baxter and many pro-business PACs.
So, over ten years, Paul Workman contributed $1,250.00 to a handful of Democrats, while making many more contributions to Republicans. It is hard to see how these few contributions translate to opposing immigration reform.
2. At a candidate forum, Paul Workman said, "I'm not in the documents business" when asked if he checks the citizenship of his workers. See Arnold Garcia, "In politics we may not get substance, but we can always count on a show," Austin American Statesman, April 2, 2010. This statement is a bit ambiguous, but hardly shows that he admittedly does not check the immigration status of his employees. In fact, according to the same American Statesman article, his companies require two forms of identification and check them for signs of fraud.
Is there any truth to this alarming mailer? It's hard to see it. The funny thing about all this is that Holly Turner has condemned Paul Workman for making far-fetched claims about her (including calling her a carpetbagger and suggesting that she doesn't really live in the district). The lesson she seems to have learned is the best response to mudslinging is hyper-mudslinging. I may be out of touch, but I believe that honesty is a conservative value. Under this standard, the mailer was not very conservative at all. I rate Holly Turner as liberal with the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment